Bibliographie indicative – Notion de conflit armé

  • R. Abi-Saab, Droit humanitaire et conflits internes : Origines et évolution de la réglementation internationale, Paris, Pedone, 1986, 280 p.
  • R. Abi-Saab, « Le droit humanitaire et les troubles internes », in The International Legal System in Quest of Equity and Universality / L’ordre juridique international, un système en quête d’équité et d’universalité. Liber Amicorum Georges Abi-Saab, Kluwer Law International, 2001, pp. 477 et s.
  • D. Akande, “Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Concepts”, in E. Wilmshurst (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 32-79.
  • R. Bartles, “Timelines, Borderlines and Conflicts. The Historical Evolution of the Legal Divide Between International and non-International Armed Conflicts”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 873, 2009.
  • N. Blokker, “The Internationalization of Domestic Conflict: The Role of the UN Security Council”, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 9, 1996, pp. 7-35.
  • K. Boustany, « La qualification des conflits en droit international public et le maintien de la paix », Revue québécoise de droit international, 1989, pp. 38-58.
  • Andrew J. Carswell, “Classifying the conflict: A Soldier’s Dilemma”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 873, 2009, pp. 143 et s.
  • A. Cullen & M. Divac Öberg, “Prosecutor v. Ramush Haradinaj et al.: Threshold of Non-international Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law”, ASIL Insights, April 23, 2008
  • Hans P. Gasser, “Internationalized non-international armed conflicts: Case studies of Afghanistan, Kampuchea and Lebanon”, American University Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1983, pp. 145-161.
  • A. Geiss, “Armed Violence in Fragile States: Low-Intensity Conflicts, Spillover Conflicts, and Sporadic Enforcement Operations by Third Parties”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 873, 2009, pp. 127 et s.
  • J. de Hemptinne, « Quelques réflexions sur les conflits de qualification et de régime juridique en droit international humanitaire », in O. de Frouville & S. Touzé (dir.), 70 ans après l’adoption des conventions de Genève : Le droit international humanitaire confronté à de nouveaux défis ? Réflexions sur les interactions normatives, Paris, Pedone, 2022, pp. 37 et s.
  • E. Holland, “The Qualification Framework of International Humanitarian Law: Too Rigid to Accommodate Contemporary Conflicts?”, Suffolk Transnational Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2011, pp. 145-182.
  • Michael J. Mattler, “The Distinction between Civil Wars and International Wars and its Legal Implications”, New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, Vol. 26, 1994, pp. 655-700.
  • Mary E. O’Connell, “Defining Armed Conflict’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2008, pp. 393-400.
  • A. Paulus & M. Vashakmadze, “Asymetrical War and the Notion of Armed Conflict – A Tentative Conceptualization”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 91, No. 873, 2009, pp. 95 et s.
  • A. Rosas & P. Stenback, “The Frontiers of International Humanitarian Law”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, Special Issue on Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 1987, pp. 219-237.
  • D. Schindler, “International Humanitarian Law and Internationalized Internal Armed Conflicts”, International Review of the Red Cross, 1982, pp. 255-264.
  • D. Schindler, “The Different Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols”, Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international, 1990, pp. 125-162.
  • J.G. Stewart, “Towards a Single Definition of Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law: A Critique of Internationalized Armed Conflict”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 85, No. 850, 2003, pp. 313-350.
  • D. Willmott, “Removing the Distinction between International and non-International Armed Conflict in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court”, Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol. 5, 2004, pp. 196-219.